Sports Overload
The Premier Source for FREE Fantasy Football and Handicapping
Home                 Fantasy                 Picks                 Radio                 Contact


Fantasy Football
Pro
College


Free Picks
NFL
NCAAF
NBA
NCAAB



Your Ad Here

Posts Tagged ‘Jumpology’

Jumpology: Getting Started

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

By Ron Jumper

In the midst of football season, there is that sport with a round bouncing ball that you throw into a basket from time to time with the winner being the team that does it more. Yeah, basketball. That one, you got it. Well, I don’t know about you but I’m ready for some hoops. In particular, I love college basketball season. From the heavyweights to the mid-majors, I follow it all with pleasure. Before the season kicks off though, I have to make impossible predictions about the upcoming season and hope you forget about them after the season (unless they all come true, in that case, I’ll be sure to remind you).

I will be giving you a regular Jumpology article, which is my version of Bracketology. If you’re not following, my last name is Jumper (see above). Ahh, now it all makes sense…

I’ll be picking the entire 65-team field, from the 31 automatic bids to the 34 at-large teams.

Key:
** = Conference Champion

1 Seeds:
Kansas**
UNC**
Kentucky**
Michigan State**

These were the teams I thought really stood out from top to bottom, as I’m not quite as high on Purdue and Villanova as everyone else seems to be. Granted, I have them as 2 seeds so it isn’t like I’m down on them or anything. I see Purdue losing 4 games or so in Big Ten play, bumping them down to a 2 seed. With Villanova, I’m concerned with the lack of size even though I love the guards.

2 Seeds:
West Virginia**
UConn
Purdue
Villanova

3 Seeds:
Cal**
Duke
Texas
Tennessee

4 Seeds:
Georgia Tech
Oklahoma
Michigan
Notre Dame

The Yellow Jackets are likely to be this year’s version of Wake Forest, being a team that wasn’t very good the year before but due to an influx of young talent, as well as an abundance of size, the team drastically improves. For once, I’m higher on Notre Dame than the pre-season magazines. That has never happened before, none the less I like transfers Ben Hansbrough and Scott Martin.

5 Seeds:
Washington
Mississippi State
Georgetown
Louisville

6 Seeds:
Butler**
Clemson
Oklahoma State
Minnesota

7 Seeds:
Dayton**
Memphis**
Ole Miss
South Carolina

Some probably don’t even have Ole Miss in the dance, but I love the potential of this group. Chris Warren is my favorite point guard in the country, as he flew under the radar as an undersized guard out of Florida but has proven the critics wrong that he can be a dynamic playmaker.

8 Seeds:
UCLA
Vanderbilt
Wisconsin
Kansas State

9 Seeds:
Maryland
Pittsburgh
Illinois
Ohio State

Sometimes, it isn’t so much about the returning starters but the type of program in place. When I look at Pitt, I don’t see the same talent as last year but I also don’t see them falling off the face of the earth either. Head coach Jamie Dixon will have this team playing great defense and winning the rebound battle on most nights. It won’t be pretty, but they will still win games. Trust me.

10 Seeds:
Northern Iowa**
Cincinnati
Creighton
Virginia Tech

11 Seeds:
BYU**
Gonzaga**
Wake Forest
Xavier

Gonzaga lost everything except for Matt Bouldin and they have 9 new faces on the roster this season. They should still win the WCC, but asking them to be the giant slayers they usually are may be a tall order. Wake Forest is going to be a little better then some think, they still have size and talent. If Ishmael Smith can handle the point guard duties, this team can be pretty solid.

12 Seeds:
Old Dominion**
Siena**
Baylor
Tulsa

Tulsa finally gets over the hump, not just for the Golden Hurricane, but for the rest of Conference USA as a whole. It has been Memphis and everyone else for awhile now, but Tulsa earns the conference a well deserved at-large bid. Watch Tulsa’s Jerome Jordan, as you may hear this 7-footer’s name called in the lottery.

13 Seeds:
Cornell**
Western Kentucky**
Nevada**
Long Beach State**

14 Seeds:
Kent State**
Boston University**
Weber State**
Morehead State**

15 Seeds:
Holy Cross**
Jacksonville**
Radford**
Morgan State**

16 Seeds:
Mount St. Mary’s**
Western Carolina**
Sam Houston State**
Oral Roberts** Play-In Game
Jackson State** Play-In Game

Babe Bracket 2009: Round 1

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Sports Overload wants to know who you think is the hottest babe on the planet. To find out, we have broken up our Babe Bracket into 4 regions: Actresses, Athletes, Musicians, and The All-Time Greats. In order to qualify for The All-Time Greats region, we made the cut off at age 40. Any beautiful women over 40 is placed in this region. It is a 64-team bracket, 16 per region, just like March Madness. Over the course of the 20-week show, we will gradually have you vote on who you think is the hottest until we have crowned a champion.

Send your votes to radio@sportsoverload.com!

Round 1 Matchups

Actress Region:
I would say this is the region with the most contenders of the entire bracket, as any of the top 4 seeds in this bracket could have competed for the top seed in any of the other regions. Looking for upsets, 14 seed Kate Hudson over 3 seed Blake Lively could be a possibility depending on how the votes fall. Both 8-9 and 7-10 matchups are coin flips, though I would say the 8-9 winner could potentially pull the unthinkable and knock out the top overall seed.

1 Scarlett Johansson vs. 16 Kim Kardashian
8 Jessica Biel vs. 9 Rachel McAdams
4 Jessica Alba vs. 13 Mila Kunis
5 Eva Longoria vs. 12 Lauren Conrad
6 Ali Larter vs. 11 Gabrielle Union
3 Blake Lively vs. 14 Kate Hudson
7 Kiera Knigthly vs. 10 Angelina Jolie
2 Megan Fox vs. 15 Hayden Panettiere

 

Athlete Region:
This is the region that I expect to be the most turned upside down at the end, as any number of the higher seeds could slip in and make a run at this thing. An example would be 14 seed Heather Mitts, though her first round matchup against Daniel Hantuchova looks daunting. Also, Erin Andrews isn’t an “athlete” but she is a sportscaster/announcer so we included her in the mix.

1 Julianna Hough vs. 16 Hope Solo
8 Jennie Finch vs. 9 Anna Paula Mancino
4 Erin Andrews vs. 13 Missy Gibson
5 Anna Kournikova vs. 12 Gabrielle Reece
6 Swin Cash vs. 11 Danica Patrick
3 Daniela Hantuchova vs. 14 Heather Mitts
7 Amanda Beard vs. 10 Candace Parker
2 Maria Sharapova vs. 15 Natalie Gulbis

 

Musician Region:
This list was the second toughest to make, as there are going to be some people dissappointed with who didn’t make the cut on this list. Unfortunately, there is no NIT… but anyways, this is the second deepest region and the winner has a great shot at winning the whole thing. Some higher seeds could make a run at this region, including 5 Gwen Stefani, 7 Jessica Simpson, or 8 Britney Spears. A potential second round matchup between former Tony Romo girlfriends Jessica Simpson and Carrie Underwood should be interesting.

1 Beyonce vs. 16 Nelly Furtado
8 Britney Spears vs. 9 Mariah Carey
4 Rihanna vs. 13 Hilary Duff
5 Gwen Stefani vs. 12 Shakira
6 Taylor Swift vs. 11 Christina Milian
3 Christina Aguilera vs. 14 Cheryl Cole
7 Jessica Simpson vs. 10 Ciara
2 Carrie Underwood vs. 15 Kelly Rowland

 

The All-Time Great Region:
The cut off was 40 to qualify for this region, making some women throughout the other regions very close to the line. This region could have included hundreds of different choices, but only 16 made the list. It has the best overall depth of any region, as just making the list is impressive. The matchup of 7 seed Jennifer Lopez and 10 seed Elizabeth Hurley will knock out one of the darkhorses early on.

1 Halle Berry vs. 16 Sandra Bullock
8 Demi Moore vs. 9 Marrisa Tomei
4 Faith Hill vs. 13 Meg Ryan
5 Jaclyn Smith vs. 12 Michelle Pfeifer
6 Bo Derek vs. 11 Ashley Judd
3 Jennifer Aniston vs. 14 Courtney Cox-Arquette
7 Jennifer Lopez vs. 10 Elizabeth Hurley
2 Shania Twain vs. 15 Salma Hayek

Remember, send your votes to radio@sportsoverload.com!

Jumpology: Does Winning Trump All?

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

**Originally Posted March 24, 2009

By Ron Jumper

In regards to receiving an at-large bid for the dance, does winning in the dance validate receiving that bid? In other words, Arizona was the last team in. Does the fact that they made it to the Sweet 16 mean the committee did the right thing? Or is it what happens once they get in is irrelevant, as the body of work from the regular season is what makes you deserving of a bid?

I feel free to discuss Arizona openly because I have been a long time fan of their basketball program but, that being said, I tend to side with the thought that winning doesn’t validate being an at-large because then you have to take that fundamental argument full circle. In hindsight, does losing in the first round mean you shouldn’t have been in the tournament to start with? Teams like Clemson, Florida State, Illinois, Utah, West Virginia, and Wake Forest all lost in the first round (in some cases in embarassing fashion) but they obviously deserved to be there. Winning in the tournament has just as much to do with timing and matchups as it does anything else.

Another way to look at it is that we have no idea what would have happened had those other teams gotten in instead. Keep in mind, George Mason was the last team in and many thought it was outrageous that they got in. The Patriots made the Final Four. What if they hadn’t gotten in? Better yet, what if someone left out this season was capable of doing the same thing?

How can we know?

We can’t. That is exactly why, in my opinion, we have to judge a team’s resume and put the 34 best ones in. It isn’t what we think is the better team or who would win head-to-head because, if it was just an “eye test”, there would be way too much subjectivity and there would be no way for the committee to all agree on the same teams because they are all from different parts of the country, have differing opinions of the strength of conferences, etc. Arizona was obviously a talented team, as Jordan Hill and Chase Budinger are virtual locks for the lottery. However, if you can determine a mid-major with no future pros has a better body of work then that is who should be in. The least subjective way to evaluate teams is with the RPI, looking at the SOS, and so forth. This isn’t a foolproof system but it is the only way to keep it from being completely subjective.

Lastly, there is an emotional element that comes into play. If you are the last team in and it is controversial, the media plays it up and makes a story out of it. What often happens is that the team that has heard all week they didn’t deserve to be in comes out with a chip on their shoulder to try and prove they do belong in the field. On the flip side, the team that gets left out often acts disinterested in winning the NIT and goes out early. This has little to do with how talented each team is, but more of how motivated each team is to really compete in the postseason tournament they qualify for.



Radio
Current
Archives


Miscellaneous
NFL Mock Draft
NBA Mock Draft
Jumpology


Your Ad Here